Predictions
Matches
Calendar
H2H
Rankings
Picks Blog
John Sperle vs Amer Naow Prediction, Head-to-Head, Odds & Pick - Matchstat.com
By Wojtek Kolan
At Matchstat.com we give you unbeatable in-depth analysis of past and current event tennis stats, to give you accurate tennis predictions, picks, odds and value bets. Let's dive in with our Sperle vs Naow analysis and find out who is favored!
John Sperle vs Amer Naow Important H2H Prediction Stats:
Head-to-head: Sperle 1 - 0 Naow
- Second serve performance recent form: In recent form (last 6 months), Sperle has won 49.56% of points on their second serve, while Naow has won 0%. There is a high correlation between this stat and match prediction accuracy.
- Return game stats recent form: Return stats show Sperle, in recent form, has won 54.48% of their opponent's second serve points, while Naow has won 0%. The same stats for first serve returns are 37.12% and 0% respectively and this has a high correlation to pick who is favored in this H2H matchup.
- Under pressure analysis: Sperle has saved 54.59% of breakpoints in recent form, whereas Naow has saved 0% which is a useful statistic for in-game betting predictions.
- Performance overview: Over the last year Sperle has won 62.5% of matches played (W/L 45/ 27), with Naow winning 66.67% (W/L 2/ 1) that gives us an overall head-to head prediction overview.
- Best surface: Sperle has their best career surface win % on Clay, winning 61% (W/L 91/ 57), and worse career win % on I.hard, winning 40% (W/L 2/ 3). Naow has their best career surface win % on I.hard, winning 67% (W/L 2/ 1), and worse career win % on Hard, winning 0% (W/L 0/ 2).
- Player level: In the last year, Sperle has played most of their matches on the Futures/Satellites/ITF tournaments $10K, winning 63.77% of matches (W/L 44/ 25), where as Naow has played most of their matches on the Futures/Satellites/ITF tournaments $10K, winning 66.67% of matches (W/L 2/ 1). When comparing stats between players to predict the favorite, it is of course all relative to the event level they have been playing at.
- Direct H2H matches: They have played 1 times before with Sperle winning 1 times and Naow being victorious 0 times. They have played 2 sets in total, with Sperle winning 2 and Naow winning 0. The last match between Sperle and Naow was at the M15 Antalya, 11-10-2021, Q2 round, Clay with John Sperle getting the victory 6-1 6-4.
- Head to head match duration: In past head to head matches, the average match time between these players has been 1:14:0.
- Deciding set H2H prediction: Sperle and Naow have played a deciding set 0 times, with Sperle winning 0 times and Naow 0 times. Very useful for predicting the outcome if this match goes the distance.
- Head-to-Head extreme pressure situations: They have played 0 tiebreaks against each other with Sperle winning 0, and Naow 0.
- Opponent quality stats: Over the last 12 months, Sperle has played against opponents with an average rank of 89.11 while Naow has played against players with an average rank of 0.
- Deciding set performance vs all players: If you are interested in live predictions and betting, if this match goes into a deciding set, Sperle has won 55% of deciding sets over the last 12 months, while Naow has won 0% in all matches played on tour.
- Break point conversion: In recent form, Sperle has converted 46.04% of breakpoint opportunities, and Naow has converted 0% of their chances to break their opponents serve. A telling stat for in-game live betting tips when either player has a breakpoint opportunity.
- If you are interested in models that predict tennis matches, this article is a good start (Warning: Stats geeks only)
733
Rank
725
High
22
Age
Plays
1
Total0
0
Hard0
1
Clay0
0
Indoor0
0
Grass0
N/A
Rank
High
29
Age
R
Plays
W
W
L
W
W
L
W
L
W
L
Form
L
L
L
W
L
W
L
W
W
L
59% (113-79)
Career Total W/L
48% (16-17)
65% (24-13)
YTD W/L
67% (2-1)
$0
Career Prize Money
$0
0
YTD Titles
0
Currently displayed stats includes matches of all levels. To exclude lower level events (as per ATP / WTA official stats) toggle button in page footer.
The Best Odds For John Sperle vs Amer Naow For Any Market:
We highly recommend you open accounts with at least 3 Bookmakers as depending on the match, odds can vary a lot between them, and always getting the best odds available will improve your profitability a lot in the long run. We recommend these Sportsbooks for you so sign up now! Check the current best odds by clicking the Sportsbook links below:
Sportsbooks & Bookies Promo Codes For Sperle VS Naow
Sportsbook
Offer
| stats | John Sperle | Amer Naow |
|---|---|---|
| All H2H Matches | 1 | 0 |
| Sets Won | 2 | 0 |
| Games Won | 12 | 5 |
| Aces (Total) | 1 | 2 |
| DFs Total | 2 | 2 |
| Avg Match Time | 1:14:0 | 1:14:0 |
| 1st Serve % | 63% (31/49) | 63% (38/60) |
| 1st Serve Win% | 81% (25/31) | 61% (23/38) |
| 2nd Serve Win% | 39% (7/18) | 36% (8/22) |
| BPs Won% (Total) | 50% (5/10) | 50% (1/2) |
| Return Points W% | 48% (29/60) | 35% (17/49) |
| Best of 3 Sets W% | 100% (1/1) | 0% (0/1) |
| Best of 5 Sets W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| TBs Win% (Total) | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Deciding Set Win% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st set W, W | 100% (1/1) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st set W, L | 0% (1/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st set L, W | 0% (0/0) | 0% (1/0) |
| Winning Player | Losing Player | Score | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 6-1 6-4 |
Stats 
John Sperle
Player
Amer Naow
63%
(
31 of
49)
1st Serve %
63%
(
38 of
60)
1
Aces
2
2
Double Faults
2
81%
(
25 of
31)
1st Serve Won
61%
(
23 of
38)
39%
(
7 of
18)
2nd Serve Won
36%
(
8 of
22)
50%
(
5 of
10)
Break Points Won
50%
(
1 of
2)
35%
(
17 of
49)
Rtn Points Won
48%
(
29 of
60)
61
Total Points Won
48
|
||||
Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents
| stats | John Sperle | Amer Naow |
|---|---|---|
| YTD W/L | 65% (24/13) | 67% (2/1) |
| Sets Win/Loss | 62% (53/33) | 67% (4/2) |
| Games Win/Loss | 54% (446/375) | 64% (30/17) |
| Hard Win/Loss | 56% (5/4) | 0% (0/0) |
| Clay Win/Loss | 68% (19/9) | 67% (2/1) |
| Indoor Hard W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Grass Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Aces pg | 0.16 | 0 |
| Aces Total | 65 | 0 |
| DFs per game | 0.16 | 0 |
| DFs Total | 63 | 0 |
| Avg Match Time | 1:41:40 | 1st Match |
| Avg Opp Rank | 35.24 | 0 |
| 1st Serve % | 62% (1453/2355) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st Serve W% | 65% (946/1453) | 0% (0/0) |
| 2nd Serve W% | 50% (447/902) | 0% (0/0) |
| BPs Won% Total | 46% (128/278) | 0% (0/0) |
| Return Pts W% | 44% (1005/2279) | 0% (0/0) |
| Slam W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Masters W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Cups W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Main Tour W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Tour Finals W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Challenger W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Futures W/L | 65% (24/13) | 67% (2/1) |
| Best of 3 Sets W% | 65% (24/37) | 67% (2/3) |
| Best of 5 Sets W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| TBs Win% (Total) | 58% (7/12) | 0% (0/0) |
| Deciding Set W% | 58% (7/12) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st set W, W | 88% (25/22) | 100% (2/2) |
| 1st set W, L | 12% (25/3) | 0% (2/0) |
| 1st set L, W | 17% (12/2) | 0% (1/0) |
John Sperle Recent Matches Played
Before:
| OPPONENT | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| R2 |
Stats
Raphael Perot
Player
John Sperle
74%
(
57 of
77)
1st Serve %
70%
(
50 of
71)
5
Aces
0
-
Double Faults
-
77%
(
44 of
57)
1st Serve Won
56%
(
28 of
50)
55%
(
11 of
20)
2nd Serve Won
57%
(
12 of
21)
80%
(
4 of
5)
Break Points Won
50%
(
1 of
2)
29%
(
22 of
77)
Rtn Points Won
44%
(
31 of
71)
86
Total Points Won
62
|
4-6 6-3 6-0 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
John Sperle
Player
Tibo Colson
73%
(
58 of
80)
1st Serve %
64%
(
48 of
75)
1
Aces
8
0
Double Faults
3
64%
(
37 of
58)
1st Serve Won
71%
(
34 of
48)
77%
(
17 of
22)
2nd Serve Won
48%
(
13 of
27)
44%
(
4 of
9)
Break Points Won
29%
(
2 of
7)
33%
(
26 of
80)
Rtn Points Won
37%
(
28 of
75)
82
Total Points Won
73
|
6-2 4-6 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Daniel Dutra Da Silva
Player
John Sperle
57%
(
33 of
58)
1st Serve %
64%
(
44 of
69)
1
Aces
0
2
Double Faults
0
76%
(
25 of
33)
1st Serve Won
61%
(
27 of
44)
56%
(
14 of
25)
2nd Serve Won
44%
(
11 of
25)
50%
(
4 of
8)
Break Points Won
100%
(
2 of
2)
33%
(
19 of
58)
Rtn Points Won
45%
(
31 of
69)
70
Total Points Won
57
|
7-6(5) 6-2 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
John Sperle
Player
Stefan Latinovic
67%
(
61 of
91)
1st Serve %
61%
(
54 of
88)
1
Aces
5
0
Double Faults
4
69%
(
42 of
61)
1st Serve Won
69%
(
37 of
54)
53%
(
16 of
30)
2nd Serve Won
47%
(
16 of
34)
30%
(
3 of
10)
Break Points Won
67%
(
4 of
6)
36%
(
33 of
91)
Rtn Points Won
40%
(
35 of
88)
93
Total Points Won
86
|
6-3 2-6 7-6(3) | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Michael Agwi
Player
John Sperle
60%
(
56 of
94)
1st Serve %
58%
(
62 of
106)
7
Aces
0
3
Double Faults
3
71%
(
40 of
56)
1st Serve Won
61%
(
38 of
62)
42%
(
16 of
38)
2nd Serve Won
48%
(
21 of
44)
100%
(
5 of
5)
Break Points Won
33%
(
4 of
12)
40%
(
38 of
94)
Rtn Points Won
44%
(
47 of
106)
103
Total Points Won
97
|
6-4 3-6 7-5 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
John Sperle
Player
Maxim Mrva
60%
(
58 of
97)
1st Serve %
36%
(
35 of
97)
1
Aces
1
3
Double Faults
8
62%
(
36 of
58)
1st Serve Won
57%
(
20 of
35)
49%
(
19 of
39)
2nd Serve Won
48%
(
30 of
62)
39%
(
7 of
18)
Break Points Won
60%
(
6 of
10)
43%
(
42 of
97)
Rtn Points Won
48%
(
47 of
97)
102
Total Points Won
92
|
4-6 7-5 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
John Sperle
Player
Edoardo Zanada
59%
(
69 of
116)
1st Serve %
55%
(
44 of
80)
2
Aces
3
2
Double Faults
9
67%
(
46 of
69)
1st Serve Won
57%
(
25 of
44)
47%
(
22 of
47)
2nd Serve Won
39%
(
14 of
36)
55%
(
6 of
11)
Break Points Won
20%
(
3 of
15)
41%
(
48 of
116)
Rtn Points Won
51%
(
41 of
80)
109
Total Points Won
87
|
6-3 6-7(5) 6-1 | H2H | ||
| SF |
Stats
Mika Brunold
Player
John Sperle
58%
(
45 of
78)
1st Serve %
54%
(
44 of
81)
4
Aces
3
5
Double Faults
1
64%
(
29 of
45)
1st Serve Won
55%
(
24 of
44)
48%
(
16 of
33)
2nd Serve Won
43%
(
16 of
37)
42%
(
5 of
12)
Break Points Won
23%
(
3 of
13)
42%
(
33 of
78)
Rtn Points Won
51%
(
41 of
81)
86
Total Points Won
73
|
7-6(5) 6-1 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
John Sperle
Player
Andrin Casanova
48%
(
34 of
71)
1st Serve %
46%
(
28 of
61)
2
Aces
1
3
Double Faults
3
62%
(
21 of
34)
1st Serve Won
54%
(
15 of
28)
59%
(
22 of
37)
2nd Serve Won
48%
(
16 of
33)
63%
(
5 of
8)
Break Points Won
25%
(
2 of
8)
39%
(
28 of
71)
Rtn Points Won
49%
(
30 of
61)
73
Total Points Won
59
|
6-2 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
John Sperle
Player
Michael Bassem Sobhy
54%
(
31 of
57)
1st Serve %
41%
(
17 of
41)
1
Aces
2
1
Double Faults
3
71%
(
22 of
31)
1st Serve Won
59%
(
10 of
17)
65%
(
17 of
26)
2nd Serve Won
38%
(
9 of
24)
50%
(
4 of
8)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
5)
32%
(
18 of
57)
Rtn Points Won
54%
(
22 of
41)
61
Total Points Won
37
|
6-3 6-0 | H2H | ||
view more
Amer Naow Recent Matches Played
Before:
| OPPONENT | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| QF | 6-4 6-2 | H2H | |||
| Q2 | 6-1 6-0 | H2H | |||
| Q1 | 6-1 6-3 | H2H | |||
| Q2 |
Stats
Koray Kirci
Player
Amer Naow
41%
(
21 of
51)
1st Serve %
69%
(
44 of
64)
2
Aces
1
2
Double Faults
2
81%
(
17 of
21)
1st Serve Won
61%
(
27 of
44)
63%
(
19 of
30)
2nd Serve Won
35%
(
7 of
20)
44%
(
4 of
9)
Break Points Won
33%
(
1 of
3)
29%
(
15 of
51)
Rtn Points Won
47%
(
30 of
64)
66
Total Points Won
49
|
6-3 6-3 | H2H | ||
| Q1 | 3-6 6-4 10-8 | H2H | |||
| Q2 |
Stats
John Sperle
Player
Amer Naow
63%
(
31 of
49)
1st Serve %
63%
(
38 of
60)
1
Aces
2
2
Double Faults
2
81%
(
25 of
31)
1st Serve Won
61%
(
23 of
38)
39%
(
7 of
18)
2nd Serve Won
36%
(
8 of
22)
50%
(
5 of
10)
Break Points Won
50%
(
1 of
2)
35%
(
17 of
49)
Rtn Points Won
48%
(
29 of
60)
61
Total Points Won
48
|
6-1 6-4 | H2H | ||
| Q1 | 6-0 6-0 | H2H | |||
| Q1 | 6-1 6-7(4) 10-2 | H2H | |||
| Q1 | 6-4 7-5 | H2H | |||
| Rubber 2 | 6-3 6-3 | H2H | |||
view more
Sperle Vs Naow Prediction H2H Images To Share
More tennis photos of Sperle are available here and Naow photos here.
Potential H2H Matches This Week For John Sperle
Today's H2H Tennis Betting Tips & Predictions
If you are looking to predict tennis or soccer matches, Matchstat.com has you covered! We have league, player and team stats, and specialise in detailed h2h stats between tennis players or soccer teams.
All our predictions are based on machine learning and AI. Matchstat is designed to help you in your analysis and predictions but the responsibility for your final predictions are your own.
It's good to talk... Get in touch with us [email protected]
